DEAL ARCHIVE
Roche acquired the remaining Foundation Medicine stake for $137 per share in cash · $2.4bn minority buyout · $5.3bn total company value
Published 24 Aug 2026 · Historical analysis
Deal Intelligence · Precision Oncology · M&A

Roche Acquires Foundation Medicine and Brings Precision Oncology’s Data Layer Fully In-House

Roche acquired the Foundation Medicine shares it did not already own for $137 in cash per share, a $2.4bn transaction that put a $5.3bn fully diluted value on the cancer-genomics platform. The minority buyout completed a strategic relationship built through a 2015 majority investment, global commercialisation rights and joint R&D. The commercial question was control of the evidence layer connecting comprehensive genomic profiling, companion diagnostics and oncology drug development.

Transaction identityCompleted, July 2018
Roche Holding Ltd
Acquirer · Public
Basel, Switzerland · founded 1896
Acquires · cash
Foundation Medicine, Inc.
Target · Public at announcement
Cambridge, Massachusetts · founded 2010
Remaining stake
$2.4bn
Total value
$5.3bn
Offer price
$137.00
Q2 2018 revenue
$57m
Announced
19 Jun 2018
Completed
Jul 2018
Transaction data
ROCHE · OFFER$137.00CASH / SHARE
TOTAL VALUE$5.3bnFULLY DILUTED
REMAINING STAKE$2.4bnCASH CONSIDERATION
ROCHE OWNERSHIP56.6%PRE-TENDER
FMI FY2017 REVENUE$152.9m+31%
FMI Q2 2018 REVENUE$57.0m+63%
CLINICAL TESTS 201767,375+54%
2015 ENTRY PRICE$50.00PER SHARE
ROCHE · OFFER$137.00CASH / SHARE
TOTAL VALUE$5.3bnFULLY DILUTED
REMAINING STAKE$2.4bnCASH CONSIDERATION
ROCHE OWNERSHIP56.6%PRE-TENDER
FMI FY2017 REVENUE$152.9m+31%
FMI Q2 2018 REVENUE$57.0m+63%
CLINICAL TESTS 201767,375+54%
2015 ENTRY PRICE$50.00PER SHARE
Public recordTransaction dataHistorical figureFigures from 2015 to 2018 transaction materials
Remaining-stake consideration
$0.0bn
Cash consideration for shares outside Roche ownership
Public record
Total company value
$0.0bn
Fully diluted value stated by Roche at announcement
Public record
Offer premium
0%
Premium to 18 June 2018 closing price
Public record
FY2017 revenue
$0.0m
Foundation Medicine reported revenue
Public record
Total value / annualised Q2 revenue
0.0×
$5.3bn divided by annualised Q2 2018 revenue
Acquiry calculation
01 · What happened

Roche turns a strategic holding into the data and diagnostics platform beneath precision oncology

Announced 19 June 2018. Completed through a tender offer and second-step merger in July 2018.

Roche bought the Foundation Medicine shares it did not already own for $137 in cash per share, a $2.4bn minority buyout that put a $5.3bn fully diluted value on the cancer-genomics company. The commercial significance was larger than the legal step: Roche moved from majority owner and distribution partner to sole owner of a platform connecting genomic profiling, companion diagnostics, oncology drug development and clinical decision support. [1]

The deal followed three years in which Roche had used a majority stake, an R&D collaboration and ex-US commercial rights to build the relationship. At signing, Roche controlled approximately 56.6% of Foundation Medicine’s outstanding shares. The remaining purchase consolidated an asset already woven into Roche’s personalised-healthcare strategy. [2]

“Molecular insights and the broad availability of high quality comprehensive genomic profiling are key enablers for the development of, and access to, new cancer treatments.” Daniel O’Day, Roche Pharmaceuticals CEO, 19 June 2018
The deal in one line

Roche paid up for control of a high-growth but loss-making diagnostics and data platform at the point where FDA approval, Medicare coverage and global distribution were beginning to make comprehensive genomic profiling commercially scalable.

02 · Terms

A cash tender offer converted a controlled public company into a wholly owned affiliate

The consideration and legal path were explicitly disclosed. The underlying merger agreement and 14D-9 provide the operative record.

TermDetailSource status
AcquirerRoche Holdings, Inc., through 062018 Merger Subsidiary, Inc.Public record
TargetFoundation Medicine, Inc., then NASDAQ: FMIPublic record
Announcement19 June 2018Public record
Consideration$137.00 cash per share for shares outside Roche’s ownershipPublic record
Transaction value$2.4bn, fully diluted, for the remaining sharesPublic record
Total company value$5.3bn, fully dilutedPublic record
Premium29% to 18 June 2018 close; 47% and 68% to 30-day and 90-day VWAPPublic record
Closing mechanismTender offer followed by a Section 251(h) second-step mergerPublic record
AdvisersCiti and Davis Polk for Roche; Goldman Sachs and Goodwin Procter for Foundation Medicine’s special committeePublic record

Roche disclosed all core economic terms. Financing sources, break-fee terms and retention arrangements were not itemised in the announcement materials reviewed for this page. That is the only disclosure gap relevant to the headline transaction structure.

03 · The asset

A molecular-information business with clinical, biopharma and data feedback loops

Foundation Medicine offered a comprehensive genomic profiling platform rather than a single diagnostic product.

Foundation Medicine’s clinical assays profiled tumour tissue and blood to identify genomic alterations, match patients with relevant targeted therapies and immunotherapies, and surface clinical-trial options. Its business combined physician-ordered testing with work for biopharma customers, including clinical-study testing, biomarker work and companion diagnostic development. [3]

Clinical engine

FoundationOne CDx

The FDA approved the broad companion diagnostic assay for solid tumours in November 2017. CMS followed with nationwide Medicare coverage in March 2018 for eligible advanced-cancer patients.

Biopharma engine

Data that informs development

Pharma customers used the platform for profiling, trial design, biomarker discovery and companion diagnostic programmes, creating a customer base alongside clinical testing.

Data engine

FoundationCORE

Each profiled tumour added to an evolving molecular information base. The strategic value sat in the loop between testing volume, evidence generation and oncology R&D.

Roche’s current profile says Foundation Medicine remains an independent affiliate with more than 1,700 employees and CGP tests analysing more than 300 cancer-related genes. That scale is a later outcome, not a 2018 deal metric, but it illustrates the platform Roche chose to consolidate. [4]

04 · Unit economics

The price captured strategic momentum while the operating model was still being built out

The key valuation tension was straightforward: rapid revenue growth and a widening data moat against meaningful operating losses and capital needs.

Foundation Medicine reported $152.9m of 2017 revenue, up 31% year on year, and $57.0m for the second quarter of 2018, up 63% year on year. Annualising the second-quarter run rate produces $228.0m, which puts the $5.3bn company value at 23.2× annualised Q2 revenue. Using 2017 reported revenue, the same figure is 34.7×. Both are Acquiry calculations and are revenue reference points, not EBITDA multiples. [5] [6]

The company was still consuming cash. In the first half of 2018 it reported a $70.8m net loss and $60.2m of net cash used in operating activities. Roche funding was already part of the capital structure, with $110m of non-current indebtedness to Roche at 30 June 2018. The buyout therefore secured an operating asset and removed the public-market funding question at the same time. [6]

Acquiry calculation$5.3bn total company value ÷ $228.0m annualised Q2 2018 revenue = 23.2×Annualised revenue is a reference framework, not company guidance.
05 · Buyer rationale

Roche paid for control where diagnostics, drug development and global access meet

The 2015 alliance had already outlined the logic. The 2018 buyout brought control, duration and capital allocation inside the group.

01

Secure the diagnostic layer for personalised oncology

FoundationOne CDx had a recently established regulatory and reimbursement foothold. Ownership aligned the diagnostic platform with Roche’s oncology portfolio and companion-diagnostic agenda.

Public record
02

Turn distribution rights into operating control

Roche already held ex-US commercialisation rights for several tests. Full ownership gave it a single decision path for global launch, investment and product evolution.

Public record
03

Protect the molecular-data feedback loop

CGP testing, biopharma research and companion diagnostics compounded the value of a common molecular information base. Control reduces coordination cost across those activities.

Acquiry inference
04

Fund the next scale phase away from quarterly-market pressure

Foundation Medicine’s revenue momentum came with substantial research, laboratory and commercial spend. A private affiliate structure matched that investment profile.

Acquiry inference
Distribution

A global commercial network was already built into the relationship

In 2015, Roche and Foundation Medicine paired a majority investment with an ex-US commercialisation agreement. Roche’s distribution platform was part of the design from the outset, alongside joint R&D, medical education and companion-diagnostic work.

Abstract three-dimensional network representing molecular profiling, oncology data and global distribution
06 · Metrics

The operating evidence Roche was buying

All figures are historical disclosures from the last full year and first half before completion.

2017 revenue$152.9m31% growth
Q2 2018 revenue$57.0m63% growth
2017 clinical tests67,37554% growth
Q1 2018 clinical tests21,86157% growth
H1 2018 operating cash use$60.2mHistoric
Roche debt at 30 Jun 2018$110mRelated-party funding

Revenue split mattered. In 2017, Foundation Medicine reported $99.7m from biopharmaceutical customers and $53.2m from clinical testing. The blended model meant a Roche oncology pipeline could benefit from the target’s data and trial capabilities while a growing clinical base expanded the evidence set. [5]

07 · Precedents

The relevant precedent was Roche’s own staged acquisition

This was the final leg of a strategic relationship, rather than a fresh auction for an unencumbered target.

Roche’s 2015 transaction combined an approximately $780m tender offer with a $250m primary investment at $50 per share. It left Roche with between 52.4% and 56.3% on a fully diluted basis and paired the ownership stake with R&D and commercial agreements. By June 2018, the $137 offer price was 2.74× the 2015 price per share. [7]

Offer-price pathAcquiry calculation

$50.00 per share in the 2015 transaction and $137.00 per share in the 2018 take-private. This is an offer-price comparison, not an IRR calculation.

08 · Comparables

Revenue reference points frame the price more usefully than generic diagnostics comparables

The asset combined laboratory testing, regulated diagnostics, biopharma services and molecular data. Comparable-company screens capture only part of that mix.

Foundation Medicine’s $5.3bn value was 34.7× 2017 revenue and 23.2× annualised second-quarter 2018 revenue. The remaining-share consideration was 15.7× 2017 revenue. The spread is a reminder that the $2.4bn figure relates to the minority interest, while the $5.3bn figure is the appropriate starting point for total-company valuation. [6]

Valuation reference pointsAcquiry calculation

Figures are based on disclosed transaction values and reported historical revenue. They are not peer trading multiples.

Valuation path

From a $50 strategic entry price to $137 for full control

The change reflects more than a public-market re-rating. In the intervening period, the partnership established a broad collaboration, Roche became the global distribution partner for key products, and FoundationOne CDx gained FDA approval and Medicare coverage.

Abstract three-dimensional financial path in blue and silver
09 · Reference points

Four figures describe four different economic views of the same company

FigureWhat it measuresHow to use it
$50 per share2015 Roche tender and primary investment priceStrategic entry point
$1.03bn2015 tender plus primary investmentCapital invested to gain majority control
$2.4bn2018 remaining-share considerationCash cost to complete ownership
$5.3bn2018 fully diluted total company valueTotal-company valuation reference

Conflating the $2.4bn buyout cost with the $5.3bn company value would flatten an important ownership distinction. Roche already owned a majority stake before the tender, so it paid for the minority while valuing the whole enterprise.

10 · Capital history

Roche’s capital relationship progressed from investor to lender to sole owner

The financing history is also the integration history.

2012Roche affiliate bought Series B preferred shares, later converted into common stock.
Apr 2015Roche acquired 15.6m shares for about $780.2m and invested $250m in new shares.
2017–18Foundation Medicine drew on a Roche Finance credit facility, reporting $110m non-current indebtedness at 30 June 2018.
Jul 2018Roche completed the tender and merger, taking Foundation Medicine private.

The capital stack placed Roche across every layer of the relationship: shareholder, commercial collaborator, creditor and eventual owner. That structure made an arm’s-length auction an unlikely organising principle for the final transaction. Acquiry inference

Ownership model

Independent operating company, Roche-controlled strategic platform

Both the 2015 collaboration and the 2018 announcement emphasised Foundation Medicine’s continuing autonomy. The governance choice preserved the specialist brand and external biopharma relationships while Roche absorbed the ownership and funding risk.

Abstract representation of shared ownership consolidating into one structure
11 · Where the value goes

The $2.4bn was consideration for the minority; the $5.3bn was the value of the whole

At announcement, Roche owned roughly 56.6% of Foundation Medicine’s outstanding shares. The $2.4bn transaction value represented the disclosed consideration for the shares outside that position. The difference between $5.3bn total company value and $2.4bn consideration is $2.9bn, which is a valuation context for Roche’s pre-existing interest, not a new cash payment. Acquiry calculation

Ownership and consideration bridgePublic record

Values are presented as transaction-value reference points. They should not be read as proceeds attribution across individual shareholders.

12 · Market context

Regulatory validation and reimbursement support shifted the commercial horizon

FoundationOne CDx was approved by the FDA in November 2017 as a broad companion diagnostic for solid tumours. CMS issued a final National Coverage Determination in March 2018 establishing nationwide Medicare coverage for eligible advanced-cancer patients. Those events supplied clinical and payment infrastructure at a point when biopharma demand for biomarker-led development was expanding. [6]

For Roche, the commercial question was less about buying a test catalogue than controlling an operating system for oncology evidence. Profiling volume could contribute to patient care, clinical trial enrolment, drug development and companion diagnostics. That combination explains why revenue multiples alone leave much of the deal logic unexplained. Acquiry inference

13 · Competitive

The advantage lay in proof, distribution and the ability to compound a data set

Clinical validation

FDA approval and CMS coverage for FoundationOne CDx created a regulated route into routine oncology practice.

Biopharma relevance

Pharma services brought external data demand, trial activity and companion-diagnostic opportunities into the platform.

Global distribution

Roche’s ex-US commercial rights and oncology presence gave the asset a pathway that an independent specialist would have needed years to build.

Competition remained real across liquid biopsy, tissue sequencing, laboratory services and broader oncology data. The core strategic distinction was Roche’s ability to join diagnostics, therapeutics and market access within one group while maintaining Foundation Medicine as a specialist operating entity. Acquiry inference

14 · Value levers

Five routes from ownership to commercial value

01

Broaden reimbursed clinical access

Use the FoundationOne CDx regulatory and coverage base to expand testing adoption across geographies and tumour settings.

02

Link diagnostic evidence to Roche oncology programmes

Bring molecular profiling, biomarker work and companion-diagnostic development closer to the drug portfolio.

03

Expand the biopharma services franchise

Use global scale and a growing molecular-information base to deepen work with external drug developers.

04

Improve laboratory and commercial scale economics

Higher test throughput and a wider commercial network can spread fixed laboratory, regulatory and sales costs.

05

Protect long-duration data value

Retain ownership of the testing-to-evidence loop as precision oncology becomes more biomarker-led.

15 · Risk register

Execution depends on clinical adoption, reimbursement and data stewardship

Reimbursement expansionCoverage breadth and payment levels influence clinical uptake and the economics of each test.
Competitive technology changeLiquid biopsy, lower-cost sequencing and alternative testing approaches could change the product mix.
Laboratory scaleVolume growth requires reliable operations, quality control and continued capital investment.
External-partner trustBiopharma customers may require confidence that the autonomous operating model protects collaboration choice.
Regulatory evolutionDiagnostics regulation and companion-diagnostic requirements can add cost and alter commercial timing.
Data governanceMolecular information has high strategic value and requires careful security, privacy and access controls.

These are operating execution questions, rather than challenges to the transaction rationale. Roche’s control and capital capacity address some of them; clinical adoption and reimbursement remain market-dependent.

The capital question

Full ownership brought Foundation Medicine’s investment needs inside Roche

At 30 June 2018, Foundation Medicine reported $53.4m of cash, $110m of non-current indebtedness to Roche and $60.2m of first-half operating cash use. Taking the company private reduced dependence on the public equity market as it funded laboratory, regulatory, R&D and commercial growth.

Abstract three-dimensional capital flow visual in dark blue
16 · Integration

Roche bought control while retaining the specialist operating model

The announcement said Foundation Medicine would continue as a separate and autonomous legal entity. That was commercially sensible: the asset’s value depended on its role across multiple biopharma customers and on a specialist brand within precision oncology. Roche’s current corporate profile continues to describe Foundation Medicine as an independent affiliate. [1] [4]

Acquiry inference: the deal’s integration thesis was coordination without absorption. Roche could centralise capital allocation, global access and portfolio linkage while leaving the laboratory, clinical and external-partner front end close to the domain expertise that made the target valuable.

17 · Timeline

A six-year progression from minority investor to sole owner

2012Roche affiliate invests in Foundation Medicine’s Series B.
Jan 2015Roche announces majority investment, R&D collaboration and commercial agreements.
Apr 20152015 investment closes, giving Roche a majority position.
Nov 2017FDA approves FoundationOne CDx.
Mar 2018CMS establishes nationwide coverage for eligible FoundationOne CDx patients.
19 Jun 2018Roche announces $137-per-share cash offer for remaining shares.
31 Jul 2018Roche accepts tendered shares and moves to complete the merger.
18 · Consequences

A clearer capital and distribution path for the platform, with a changed ownership backdrop for partners

Roche

Gained full control over a precision-oncology platform already connected to its drug-development and diagnostics activities.

Foundation Medicine

Gained access to Roche’s capital base and global operating reach while preserving an autonomous affiliate structure.

Minority holders

Received a cash exit at $137 per share, a 29% premium to the preceding close.

Biopharma partners

Inherited a more deeply Roche-owned collaborator, alongside an explicit commitment to operate independently.

The acquirer

Roche’s two-engine model made the target strategically legible

Roche combined pharmaceuticals and diagnostics under one group and had made personalised healthcare a stated strategic priority. Foundation Medicine strengthened the molecular information layer linking those engines in oncology.

Abstract three-dimensional healthcare platform composition
19 · Verdict

A strategically coherent consolidation that valued a future platform, not current profit

Roche’s price recognised a company moving from specialist testing provider toward a broader precision-oncology infrastructure role. The multiple was high against reported revenue and the target was loss-making, yet the deal joined assets that had already been operationally linked for three years: molecular profiling, companion diagnostics, oncology R&D, global commercialisation and a growing clinical data set.

Acquiry inference: Roche’s core wager was that ownership of the molecular information layer would improve both the economics and the strategic reach of its oncology franchise over a longer horizon than public-market investors were prepared to finance. The current scale of the independent affiliate offers evidence that the operating model remained central to that thesis, although it cannot isolate the economic contribution of the 2018 deal.

20 · What to watch

The durable questions sit in coverage, data scale and partner confidence

Coverage breadthHow far reimbursed CGP testing moves beyond the initial Medicare foundation.
Test and data volumeWhether growing clinical use compounds the molecular-information base and product evidence.
Biopharma mixThe extent to which external drug developers continue to use the platform alongside Roche programmes.
International accessHow Roche’s global network translates approved products into local launch and reimbursement.
Autonomy in practiceWhether the independent-affiliate model continues to support customer trust and specialist execution.
21 · Sources

Source ledger

Primary company releases and SEC filings form the factual record. Calculations are labelled where used.

The task-supplied Roche investor-update URL returned a 404 on 24 August 2026. The original 2018 Roche merger release and subsequent Roche investor update above are the primary transaction sources used here.

Joash Boyton

Founder and Managing Director, Acquiry

Joash Boyton advises founders, shareholders and strategic buyers on mergers and acquisitions across software, technology and digital businesses.

He founded Acquiry to run institutional-quality sell-side and buy-side processes for scaled digital companies, from first conversation through to signed deal. Mandates run from USD $1m to $500m across SaaS, fintech, payments, gaming, media and emerging digital verticals.

He writes Acquiry Deal Intelligence, covering announced transactions, regulatory filings, sector pricing and the strategic logic behind major software M&A. For mandates or press enquiries, write to press@acquiry.com.

References, citation and transaction questions

Primary releases and SEC filings supporting the analysis, together with the calculation method and concise answers to recurring transaction questions.

How to cite this analysis

Joash Boyton, “Roche acquires Foundation Medicine”, Acquiry Deal Intelligence, 24 August 2026.

Canonical URL: https://www.acquiry.com/deal-intelligence/roche-acquires-foundation-medicine/

Published as a historical transaction analysis. The supplied 2026 investor-update URL returned a 404, so the analysis uses the original 2018 Roche releases and transaction filings.

Which source supports which section
What happened and termsRoche merger release, Schedule 14D-9 and tender completion update.
2015 ownership and collaborationFoundation Medicine’s 2015 strategic-collaboration release and Schedule 14D-9.
Revenue, test volume and capital needsFoundation Medicine FY2017 results and Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 30 June 2018.
Current organisation profileRoche’s current Foundation Medicine corporate profile.
Valuation reference pointsAcquiry calculations using disclosed transaction values and company-reported historical revenue.
Questions on this transaction

What did Roche pay for Foundation Medicine?

Roche paid $137.00 in cash per share for shares it and its affiliates did not already own. The disclosed fully diluted transaction value was $2.4bn and the stated fully diluted total company value was $5.3bn.

Why are there both $2.4bn and $5.3bn figures?

$2.4bn was the value of the remaining-share purchase. $5.3bn was the company’s stated fully diluted total value. Roche already held approximately 56.6% before the tender.

Was the transaction cash or stock?

The offer was $137.00 per share in cash. Roche’s tender-offer materials stated that the offer was free of a financing condition.

When did the transaction complete?

Roche accepted tendered shares for payment on 31 July 2018 and then completed the acquisition through a second-step merger.

What was the strategic rationale?

Roche connected a majority-owned molecular profiling platform more tightly to its oncology, diagnostics, companion-diagnostic and global commercialisation activities.

What was Foundation Medicine’s revenue before completion?

The company reported $152.9m in FY2017 revenue and $57.0m in Q2 2018 revenue. Those figures are historic company disclosures.

What revenue multiple did the deal imply?

Acquiry calculates 34.7× FY2017 revenue and 23.2× annualised Q2 2018 revenue using the $5.3bn total company value. These are revenue reference points, not EBITDA multiples.

Why did Roche pay a high revenue reference point?

The price reflected a platform with regulatory validation, Medicare coverage, growing test volume, a biopharma services business and a data set relevant to precision-oncology development.

Who advised the parties?

Citi and Davis Polk advised Roche. Goldman Sachs and Goodwin Procter advised Foundation Medicine’s special committee.

Did Foundation Medicine retain autonomy?

Yes. The announcement said it would operate as a separate and autonomous legal entity; Roche’s current profile describes it as an independent affiliate.

What was Roche’s ownership before the offer?

The Schedule 14D-9 reported 21,019,111 shares, approximately 56.6% of shares outstanding, held by Roche and affiliates as of 25 June 2018.

What does the 2015 investment add to the analysis?

It shows the full acquisition was the culmination of a staged strategic relationship involving equity, R&D, distribution and later credit funding.

What are the key execution questions?

Reimbursement, clinical adoption, data stewardship, laboratory scale, technology competition and the confidence of external biopharma partners remain the operating questions.

How should the deal be read today?

As a historical strategic consolidation in precision oncology. Current operating scale is relevant as context but does not attribute financial outcomes to the 2018 transaction.

Data labels and method

Public record identifies company releases, SEC filings and current corporate pages. Acquiry calculation identifies arithmetic based on disclosed figures. Acquiry inference identifies clearly labelled interpretation of the transaction’s strategic logic.

Revenue-reference calculations use the total company value where comparing the whole asset, and use the remaining-share consideration only where discussing the cash cost of completing ownership. Interim revenue is annualised solely to provide a transparent reference frame.

Further reading

Related Acquiry research

Deal IntelligenceReading a transaction through ownership structureWhy staged investments change the logic of a final buyout.HealthcareBuilding the evidence layer in regulated marketsHow data, regulation and distribution compound strategic value.ValuationRevenue multiples and strategic platform valueHow to distinguish total-company value from minority buyout consideration.

Acquiring or selling a software business between $1m and $500m?

Acquiry executes buy-side and sell-side mandates across SaaS, fintech, payments, gaming, media and emerging digital verticals. Valuation benchmarking against live transaction data, target origination, deal structuring, and execution through to close.

Start here
SaaS M&A enquiry Request valuation benchmarking View current mandates
Confidential. No obligation. Response within one business day across all time zones.
Disclaimer. This report is published by Acquiry for informational purposes and constitutes market commentary, not investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Neither Roche, Inc. nor Foundation Medicine, Inc. has disclosed a purchase price for this transaction. Figures marked as reported are drawn from named press outlets citing sources, and are not confirmed by either party. Figures marked as public record are drawn from company announcements and published documentation. Figures marked as Acquiry calculation are arithmetic derivations from those inputs. Figures marked as indicative are Acquiry judgement or third-party estimate and are not disclosed data. Figures marked as not disclosed are absent from the public record and have not been estimated. Acquiry holds no position in Roche, Inc. or Foundation Medicine, Inc. and acted for neither party in this transaction. Published 21 August 2026. Analysis reflects information available at that date.