HEADLINE
Goldman Sachs is reported in talks to buy Palmer Square · $37.1bn+ firm AUM · purchase price undisclosed
Updated 23 Sep 2026 · 08:00 GMT
Deal Intelligence · Asset management · Private credit

Goldman in Talks to Buy $37 Billion Credit Firm Palmer Square

Goldman Sachs has emerged as the reported lead bidder for Palmer Square Capital Management. The $37 billion figure is assets under management, not a purchase price, and no definitive agreement has been announced.

Transaction identityReported talks · Unconfirmed
Goldman Sachs
Reported buyer · Public
NYSE: GS · New York
In talks · terms undisclosed
Palmer Square
Reported target · Private
Credit and CLO manager
Firm AUM
$37.1bn+
Price
Undisclosed
Agreement
None
Close
Undisclosed
Market intel
DEAL · REPORTED22 SEP 26BLOOMBERG
FIRM AUM$37.1bn+NOT PRICE
AGREEMENTNONEANNOUNCED
CLO AUM$27bnFEB 26
GOLDMAN AWM$4.041tnAUS
Company dataReported transactionAcquiry analysisFigures as at 23 September 2026
Status
Talks
Reported lead-bidder discussions; unconfirmed
Reported
Firm AUM
$37.1bn+
Company presentation; not consideration
Company
Regulatory AUM
$25.591bn
31 Dec 2025; different measure and date
Regulatory
Purchase price
Undisclosed
No reliable public term
Not disclosed
Expected close
Undisclosed
No definitive agreement announced
Not disclosed

Goldman Sachs has emerged as the reported lead bidder for Palmer Square Capital Management, a management-owned corporate and structured-credit specialist with more than $37.1 billion of firm assets under management. Bloomberg reported on 22 September that the parties were trying to reach an agreement, while also stating that no final decision had been made and talks could still fail. Goldman declined to comment, and Palmer Square did not respond to Bloomberg's request. [1][2]

The number in the headline is not a transaction value. It describes the scale of Palmer Square's investment platform. No purchase price, consideration structure, financing plan, exclusivity period, adviser roster, signing timetable or expected close was disclosed in the reporting reviewed for this article. [1][2][3]

The strategic logic is directionally credible but remains Acquiry analysis, not company-confirmed rationale: a specialist manager with a large CLO platform, credit products and institutional relationships could deepen Goldman Sachs Asset Management's private-credit manufacturing and broaden the products available across Goldman’s wealth, institutional and insurance channels. [6][7][9][10][11]

Goldman Sachs / Palmer Square: Reported Transaction Summary
ItemDetail
Reported potential acquirerThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS)
Reported potential targetPalmer Square Capital Management LLC
StatusReported talks No definitive agreement announced
Reported process positionGoldman described by Bloomberg as lead bidder; discussions ongoing
Firm AUMMore than $37.1bn, company presentation; not purchase price
Regulatory AUM$25,590,582,955 at 31 Dec 2025; different definition and date
CLO platform55 CLOs / $27bn CLO AUM in S&P snapshot dated 20 Feb 2026
Purchase priceNot disclosed
Consideration / financingNot disclosed
Definitive agreementNot announced
Expected closingNot disclosed
Named advisersNot disclosed in the transaction reporting reviewed

AUM, AUS, regulatory AUM and CLO AUM use different definitions and dates. They are not additive. None is a substitute for transaction consideration.

01 · Status

Reported talks, not an announced acquisition

The only defensible status as of 23 September 2026 is reported acquisition discussions. The parties have not announced a signed transaction.

Machine-readable data mapping for Figure 1.1
FieldDisclosure
StatusReported talks; no definitive agreement
Reported buyerGoldman Sachs
Reported targetPalmer Square Capital Management

Bloomberg first reported on 9 September that Palmer Square was exploring a sale. Thirteen days later, it reported that Goldman had emerged as the lead bidder. That sequence supports the existence of a competitive process, but it does not establish exclusivity, signed documentation or a closing path. No party announcement, merger agreement, Form 8-K or regulatory filing confirming a Goldman-Palmer Square transaction was identified through the research cutoff. [1][2][18]

The language matters because the title's verb is “in talks,” not “agrees to buy.” A reported lead bidder can lose, withdraw, reprice or fail to reach acceptable terms. Palmer Square's owners can also elect not to sell. Until a definitive agreement is announced, every assessment of structure, economics and timing is contingent. [1][2]

Reuters Breakingviews separately described Goldman as among the leading bidders, but its discussion relied on the Bloomberg report. The commentary's $2.8 billion illustration applies a percentage of AUM used in other manager acquisitions; Reuters explicitly says Palmer Square would probably cost less. That figure is a columnist's scenario, not reported consideration, and it is excluded from Acquiry's transaction table and charts. [19]

Reported process timeline
Company history and transaction reporting through 23 September 2026
Chart data
Reported process timeline
DateEventStatus
2009Palmer Square foundedVerified
9 Sep 2026Sale exploration reportedReported
22 Sep 2026Goldman lead-bidder talks reportedReported
23 Sep 2026No definitive agreement announcedCurrent

Sources: Palmer Square; Bloomberg.

02 · AUM versus price

The $37 billion headline is AUM, not purchase price

Palmer Square presents more than $37.1 billion of firm AUM. Its Form ADV reports $25.591 billion of regulatory AUM at an earlier date. Neither number is deal value.

Machine-readable data mapping for Figure 1.2
FieldDisclosure
Firm AUMOver $37.1bn, company presentation
Regulatory AUM$25.591bn at 31 December 2025
Purchase priceNot disclosed

Palmer Square's official site describes the firm as managing more than $37.1 billion in fixed-income and credit investments. Its strategy page separately shows “$37+ billion” of approximate firm AUM, 32 investment professionals, 100% management ownership and a 95% client retention rate. Those are company marketing metrics. [3][6]

The firm's Form ADV Part 2A reports $25,590,582,955 of regulatory AUM as of 31 December 2025. Regulatory AUM is a prescribed adviser-reporting measure, measured at a stated date, and it is not automatically the same as a later firm-wide platform AUM figure. The reviewed sources do not publish a reconciliation. The right response is to preserve both figures with labels, not average, add or choose between them. [4][5]

Transaction valuation requires different information: fee-paying AUM by strategy, blended management and incentive fees, revenue, compensation, operating profit, capital commitments, seed assets, warehouse exposure, client concentration, retention obligations and contractual durability. Palmer Square does not publish standalone revenue, EBITDA or net income in the sources reviewed. AUM alone cannot supply a defensible enterprise value. [4][6]

Three AUM lenses, zero disclosed purchase price
USD billions; dates and definitions differ; values are not additive
Chart data
Palmer Square AUM disclosures
MeasureValueDate / basis
Firm AUM$37.1bn+Company presentation
Regulatory AUM$25.591bn31 Dec 2025
CLO AUM$27bnS&P snapshot, 20 Feb 2026
Purchase priceNot disclosedTransaction reporting

Sources: Palmer Square, Form ADV, S&P Global Ratings, Bloomberg.

03 · Target

Palmer Square is a credit-manufacturing platform

The target is a management-owned specialist spanning CLO management, opportunistic credit, income strategies, private credit and structured-credit issuance across public and private vehicles.

Machine-readable data mapping for Figure 1.3
FieldDisclosure
CLOs managed55, S&P snapshot dated 20 February 2026
CLO AUM$27bn, S&P snapshot
Firm AUMOver $37.1bn, broader company presentation

Christopher Long founded Palmer Square in 2009 and serves as Chairman, CEO and Portfolio Manager. Angie Long is Chief Investment Officer and Portfolio Manager. The firm describes itself as 100% management owned. Its Form ADV brochure says equity is held directly and indirectly by principals and senior management, principally through Palmer Square Holdings LLC, which is exclusively owned and controlled by Christopher and Angie Long. [3][4][6]

The platform is wider than CLO issuance. Palmer Square discloses opportunistic credit, CLO debt, income and short-duration strategies, direct-lending access and structured-credit issuance. It packages those capabilities through mutual funds, ETFs, collective investment trusts, private funds, warehouses, separate accounts, CLOs and an affiliated listed business development company. [4][6]

S&P Global Ratings stated on 20 February 2026 that Palmer Square Europe Capital Management LLC and affiliates managed 55 CLOs with $27 billion of CLO AUM, and $36.3 billion of total AUM including non-CLO assets. The rating-agency figure is a dated manager snapshot and overlaps the broader firm figure. It is evidence of scale and repeat issuance, not an additional $27 billion to be added to the $37.1 billion. [7]

Machine-readable data mapping for Figure 1.4
FieldDisclosure
Palmer SquareCLOs, private credit, mutual funds, ETFs, CITs, SMAs and BDC
GoldmanInstitutional, wealth, insurance and alternatives distribution
SynergiesNot disclosed; analytical framework only

Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc. adds a public window into one vehicle, not into the private manager's own income statement. At 30 June 2026, PSBD reported $1.1 billion of total assets, $406.2 million of net assets and $27.3 million of quarterly total investment income. Its portfolio held 282 investments across 206 companies at approximately $1.1 billion fair value. Those figures describe the listed BDC. They must not be presented as Palmer Square Capital Management revenue or balance-sheet assets. [8]

The commercial asset is therefore a connected system: investment judgement, sourcing, collateral management, repeat issuance, fund vehicles, indexes and client relationships. A buyer is not only acquiring balances labeled AUM. It is acquiring the people, mandates, operating permissions and product structures that keep those balances in place.

04 · Goldman fit

Why the platform could fit Goldman

The likely logic is capability adjacency: add a specialist CLO and credit engine to a scaled asset-management, wealth, institutional and insurance distribution platform.

Machine-readable data mapping for Figure 1.6
FieldDisclosure
Goldman AWM AUS$4.041tn at 30 June 2026
Goldman alternatives AUS$459bn at 30 June 2026
Palmer Square firm AUMOver $37.1bn; not directly comparable to AUS

Goldman's Asset & Wealth Management business reported $4.041 trillion of assets under supervision at 30 June 2026, including $459 billion of alternative-investment AUS. It generated $3.355 billion of management and other fees in the second quarter. Goldman defines AUS more broadly than AUM, so those figures provide strategic context rather than a directly comparable denominator for Palmer Square. [9]

Goldman's 2025 annual report identifies Wealth, Alternatives and Solutions as growth avenues. It reported $115 billion of alternatives fundraising during 2025 and set a forward-looking objective of $750 billion in fee-paying alternative AUS by the end of 2030. Goldman separately stated in May 2025 that it had $130 billion of private-credit AUM across more than 1,100 positions. [10][11]

Palmer Square would be small relative to Goldman's total AUS, but scale is not the sharpest rationale. The strategic gap is specialized structured-credit manufacturing: established CLO teams, repeat collateral-manager relationships, dedicated credit funds, indexes and vehicles that can be distributed through broader institutional, wealth and insurance channels. That could expand recurring fee streams and product density. No party has confirmed those synergies or their economics. [3][6][7][9]

Scale context, not a pro forma model
AUS and AUM use different definitions; percentages are Acquiry calculations for scale only
Chart data
Platform scale
PlatformMetricValue
Goldman AWMTotal AUS$4.041tn
Goldman AWMAlternatives AUS$459bn
Palmer SquareFirm AUM$37.1bn+

Sources: Goldman Sachs Q2 2026; Palmer Square. AUS is broader than AUM.

Recent acquisition behavior reinforces the pattern. Goldman agreed to acquire Industry Ventures, a $7 billion venture platform, for $665 million at closing plus up to $300 million of contingent consideration; it announced a $2.0 billion transaction for Innovator, then agreed to pay up to $2.25 billion for NEOS and up to approximately $410 million for LCN. The strategic commonality is ownership of specialist products and teams that plug into a larger distribution system. Those transaction prices are not valid Palmer Square comparables without earnings, fee mix, growth, retention and balance-sheet commitments. [12][13][14][15]

Goldman's specialist-manager acquisition sequence
Target AUM/AUS at announcement; Palmer Square remains reported and has no disclosed price
Chart data
Selected Goldman specialist-manager transactions
TargetScaleDisclosed considerationStatus at announcement
Industry Ventures$7bn AUS$665m plus up to $300m contingentAgreement
Innovator$28bn AUSApproximately $2.0bnAgreement
NEOS$30bn assetsUp to $2.25bnAgreement
LCNApproximately $3bn AUS$260m upfront plus up to $150m contingentAgreement
Palmer Square$37.1bn+ firm AUMNot disclosedReported talks

Sources: Goldman announcements; Palmer Square; Bloomberg.

05 · Economics

What a valuation would have to underwrite

Without revenue, EBITDA, fee rates or purchase terms, the useful work is to identify the variables that determine durable manager economics, not to publish a false multiple.

The revenue base should be separated into management fees, incentive fees, CLO management fees, origination or structuring economics, fund-level reimbursements and any income linked to seed or retained investments. Each stream has a different margin, duration, volatility and capital requirement. Public AUM alone cannot reveal the mix.

The AUM quality test is equally important. Diligence should split fee-paying from non-fee-paying assets; gross from net; permanent, evergreen and closed-end capital from redeemable mandates; CLOs inside and outside reinvestment periods; third-party capital from affiliate or seeded assets; and contracted base fees from performance-linked revenue. Palmer Square's $37.1 billion headline gives scale, but not that decomposition. [3][4][6][7]

Capital intensity needs its own workstream. An asset manager does not fund every loan it manages, yet a CLO and private-credit franchise can still require warehouse lines, seed capital, risk-retention interests, CLO equity, co-investments, liquidity facilities, guarantees and balance-sheet support. The buyer's return on capital depends on how those obligations transfer or expand, not only on the purchase cheque.

Reuters Breakingviews' 7.5%-of-AUM illustration usefully demonstrates why shortcuts are tempting. It does not solve the problem. Innovator and NEOS are ETF managers with different product economics and distribution channels. Palmer Square is a structured-credit specialist with vehicles, contractual obligations and market-cycle exposure. A single AUM percentage obscures the variables that matter most. [12][14][19]

06 · Continuity

Ownership transfer is not the same as asset retention

The central execution question is whether clients, fund boards, counterparties and investment professionals remain through a change of control.

Machine-readable data mapping for Figure 1.5
FieldDisclosure
Current controlChristopher and Angie Long through management ownership
Key issueLeadership, investment committee and client continuity
TermsRetention arrangements not disclosed

Palmer Square's current control is concentrated in Christopher and Angie Long, and the firm markets itself as 100% management owned. Their roles sit at the center of investment judgement, client confidence and product identity. Any definitive transaction would need to explain leadership retention, economics, governance and investment-committee continuity. None of those arrangements is public. [3][4][6]

Client consent and fund governance are not administrative footnotes. SEC staff guidance states that Section 205(a)(2) of the Advisers Act generally requires registered-adviser contracts to provide that they cannot be assigned without client consent. Registered funds and a listed BDC add board, shareholder, interim-contract and adviser-continuity processes. The exact obligations depend on legal structure and each agreement. [4][8][16]

CLOs, private funds, collective investment trusts, warehouses and separate accounts will have their own change-of-control, assignment, key-person, trustee, lender, investor and ratings-agency provisions. A viable close plan needs a vehicle-by-vehicle matrix, not a generic “regulatory approvals” line. The broad vehicle set disclosed in Palmer Square's Form ADV makes this a core workstream. [4][6][7]

Historical compliance belongs in diligence as well. In 2020, Palmer Square settled an SEC proceeding involving pre-trade compliance controls for certain affiliated transactions. The matter is historical and settled; it should not be presented as evidence about the current sale process. It remains a relevant item for compliance testing, remediation verification and control-environment review. [17]

Reported-process risk register
Acquiry analysis; severity and likelihood are analytical, not company data
Chart data
Risk register
RiskSeverityLikelihoodResolution evidence
Talks fail or another bidder wins53Definitive agreement
Leadership or investment-team attrition53Retention and governance terms
Client / mandate consent leakage53Consent tracker and retained AUM
Valuation unsupported by earnings44Standalone financials and purchase terms
Vehicle and contract complexity44Vehicle-by-vehicle legal matrix
Credit-cycle and CLO issuance volatility43Vintage, fee and reinvestment-period data

Acquiry analysis based on disclosed platform structure and transaction status.

07 · Close path

What has to happen before this becomes a deal

A definitive agreement would be the first decisive milestone. Everything after that depends on structure, approvals, consents and retained assets.

Machine-readable data mapping for Figure 1.7
FieldDisclosure
CurrentReported talks
Next possible gateDefinitive agreement
ThenRegulatory, fund, client and contractual approvals
Expected closeNot disclosed

The immediate watch item is simple: company confirmation. A Goldman or Palmer Square announcement would need to establish buyer entity, seller or rollover holders, purchase price, consideration mix, financing, governance, leadership, employee retention, conditions, termination rights and the expected closing window. Until then, a closing timetable is not available. [1][2]

If a definitive agreement is signed, antitrust and bank-regulatory analysis would depend on acquisition value, legal entities, control and target consolidated assets. Headline AUM does not answer those tests. SEC/IARD amendments, fund-board and shareholder processes, adviser-contract consents and non-US permissions would run alongside client communications and operational separation or integration planning. [5][16]

Commercially, the most sensitive metric will be retained fee-paying AUM rather than announced AUM. A strong transaction would protect the investment team, preserve manager autonomy where it supports performance, maintain client service, and use Goldman distribution selectively rather than forcing product migration. Integration that changes portfolio process, key-person confidence or client governance too quickly could destroy the asset being acquired.

Acquiry watchlist

  • Transaction statusReported talks. Watch for a definitive agreement, a bidder change or termination of the process.
  • Purchase economicsUndisclosed. Require a bridge from consideration to fee-paying AUM, revenue, EBITDA and retained capital.
  • LeadershipUndisclosed. Test Christopher and Angie Long's roles, ownership rollover and investment-committee continuity.
  • Client retentionUnresolved. Track consent completion and fee-paying AUM retained at signing and close.
  • Vehicle permissionsUnresolved. Map registered funds, BDC, CLOs, private funds, CITs, SMAs, warehouses and side letters.
  • Capital intensityUndisclosed. Separate purchase price from seed, warehouse, risk-retention and co-investment obligations.
Sources

Sources and methodology

Original reporting establishes transaction status. Company, SEC and rating-agency disclosures establish platform facts. Acquiry analysis is labelled and never converted into an undisclosed deal term.

  1. 01Bloomberg, Goldman in Talks to Buy $37 Billion Credit Firm Palmer Square, 22 September 2026Reported
  2. 02Yahoo Finance / Bloomberg authorized republication of the 22 September reportReported
  3. 03Palmer Square Capital Management, AboutPrimary
  4. 04Palmer Square Capital Management LLC, Form ADV Part 2A Disclosure BrochureRegulatory
  5. 05SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure, Palmer Square, CRD 155697SEC
  6. 06Palmer Square, Private Funds & Customized Investment SolutionsPrimary
  7. 07S&P Global Ratings, Presale: Palmer Square CLO 2026-1Ratings
  8. 08Palmer Square Capital BDC, Q2 2026 financial resultsPrimary
  9. 09Goldman Sachs, Q2 2026 earnings results filed with the SECSEC
  10. 10Goldman Sachs 2025 Annual ReportPrimary
  11. 11Goldman Sachs, Private Credit’s Outlook Amid Rising VolatilityPrimary
  12. 12Goldman Sachs agreement to acquire Innovator Capital ManagementPrimary
  13. 13Goldman Sachs acquisition of Industry VenturesPrimary
  14. 14Goldman Sachs agreement to acquire NEOS InvestmentsPrimary
  15. 15Goldman Sachs agreement to acquire LCN Capital PartnersPrimary
  16. 16SEC Investment Management Staff Issues of Interest, Advisory Contracts: ConsentSEC
  17. 17SEC administrative proceeding concerning Palmer Square, 16 September 2020SEC
  18. 18Bloomberg, Husband and Wife Plan Sale of $37 Billion Credit Firm Palmer Square, 9 September 2026Reported
  19. 19Reuters Breakingviews, Goldman sets M&A pace with freed capitalCommentary
  20. 20Acquiry Deal Intelligence methodologyAcquiry

Method: Acquiry Deal Intelligence methodology. Acquiry was not engaged by any party. Nothing here is investment, legal or financial advice.

Questions on the reported transaction

What is known, what is only reported, and what remains undisclosed.

Bloomberg reported that Goldman had emerged as the lead bidder and was in talks to buy Palmer Square. No definitive agreement has been announced, and the report said talks could still fail.

No. The $37 billion figure is Palmer Square assets under management. Palmer Square's own site states more than $37.1 billion of firm AUM. Purchase consideration is not disclosed.

No reliable transaction price is public. Acquiry does not estimate a price from AUM because fee mix, earnings, retained capital, growth, client concentration and retention terms are undisclosed.

It manages corporate and structured-credit strategies, including opportunistic credit, CLO debt, income and short-duration mandates, private credit and structured-credit issuance across funds, CLOs, ETFs, SMAs, CITs and an affiliated BDC.

Acquiry's interpretation is that Palmer Square could add specialist CLO and credit manufacturing to Goldman's scaled alternatives, institutional, wealth and insurance distribution. Neither party has confirmed that rationale.

No closing timetable is public because no definitive agreement has been announced.

The talks may fail; another bidder may win; leadership or investment-team retention may be inadequate; client and fund approvals may reduce retained AUM; valuation may exceed durable earnings; and vehicle-level consents may delay or complicate closing.

Separately. More than $37.1 billion is Palmer Square's firm presentation; $25.591 billion is Form ADV regulatory AUM at 31 December 2025; $27 billion is a dated S&P CLO AUM snapshot. They differ by definition, date and scope and are not additive.

Disclosures

Acquiry was not engaged by Goldman Sachs, Palmer Square, their shareholders or any potential bidder. This is independent research based on public information. It is not investment, legal or financial advice, and not an offer to buy or sell any security.

Corrections and updates

Material corrections update the modified date, preserve the original publication date and add an explanatory note where required. Send corrections to press@acquiry.com or consult the Acquiry corrections policy.

Method and classification

Reported transaction facts are separated from company disclosures and Acquiry analysis. AUM is not treated as consideration. Transaction status remains reported talks until a definitive agreement is announced.

Continue reading

Related Acquiry Deal Intelligence

Fintech lending
Grab to take control of Atome Financial
A signed control transaction with disclosed staged consideration and lending-platform integration logic.
Acquiry Deal Intelligence
Financial services
The Baldwin Group $7.7bn take-private
A signed financial-services transaction with full price, leverage, valuation and approval analysis.
Acquiry Deal Intelligence
Insurance
Munich Re acquires At-Bay
A signed insurance-technology combination inside cyber risk distribution and underwriting.
Acquiry Deal Intelligence
Reference

Cite this report

ChicagoBoyton, Joash. “Goldman in Talks to Buy $37 Billion Credit Firm Palmer Square.” Acquiry Deal Intelligence, 23 September 2026. https://www.acquiry.com/deal-intelligence/goldman-in-talks-to-buy-37-billion-credit-firm-palmer-square/
BibTeX
@article{boyton2026goldmanpalmer,
  author = {Boyton, Joash},
  title = {Goldman in Talks to Buy $37 Billion Credit Firm Palmer Square},
  journal = {Acquiry Deal Intelligence},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://www.acquiry.com/deal-intelligence/goldman-in-talks-to-buy-37-billion-credit-firm-palmer-square/}
}

Share on LinkedIn Share by email