Digital Asset Acquisitions: What Buyers Need to Know

Digital asset M&A is one of the most complex transaction environments in the current market. The combination of regulatory uncertainty, technical complexity, and rapidly evolving market structures creates a due diligence challenge that is materially different from traditional digital business acquisitions. Buyers who approach this space with conventional frameworks will miss risks that are specific to the asset class.

This article covers the key considerations for buyers evaluating digital asset businesses, including exchanges, brokerages, custody providers, DeFi protocols, and blockchain infrastructure companies.

Regulatory status is the first and most important question in any digital asset acquisition. The regulatory landscape for crypto and digital asset businesses varies significantly across jurisdictions, and the gap between what is currently permitted and what may be required in the future creates material transaction risk.

Buyers need to assess: the regulatory licences held by the target, the jurisdictions in which the business operates, the compliance history and any pending regulatory actions, and the likely direction of regulatory change in each relevant jurisdiction. A business that operates in multiple jurisdictions with a patchwork of licences and compliance frameworks requires significantly more legal due diligence than one with a clean, single-jurisdiction regulatory structure.

The acquisition of a regulated entity (a licenced exchange or brokerage, for example) also typically requires regulatory approval of the change of control. This adds time and uncertainty to the transaction timeline, and buyers need to factor this into their deal structure and conditions precedent.

For businesses that hold customer assets, custody is a critical due diligence area. Buyers need to understand: how customer assets are held (hot vs. cold wallet split), the security protocols and key management procedures, the insurance coverage for digital assets, and the history of any security incidents or near-misses.

The FTX collapse demonstrated the catastrophic consequences of inadequate custody practices and the commingling of customer and proprietary assets. Buyers acquiring any business that holds customer digital assets need to conduct independent verification of the custody structure, not just rely on management representations.

For businesses with native tokens or significant cryptocurrency treasury holdings, the token economics require specific analysis. Buyers need to understand: the token supply and vesting schedule, the concentration of token holdings, the liquidity of the token in secondary markets, and the accounting treatment of token holdings on the balance sheet.

Token treasury holdings can represent a significant portion of a digital asset business's net asset value, but they also introduce mark-to-market volatility that can make traditional valuation frameworks misleading. A business that appears profitable on a fiat revenue basis may have a very different financial profile when the volatility of its token holdings is accounted for.

The technical infrastructure of a digital asset business is a critical due diligence area that requires specialist expertise. For exchanges and brokerages, buyers need to assess the trading engine architecture, the order book management system, the API infrastructure, and the scalability under peak load conditions. For DeFi protocols, the smart contract audit history and the governance structure are primary concerns.

Technical debt in digital asset businesses is often significant and poorly documented. Businesses that have grown rapidly in bull market conditions frequently have infrastructure that was built for speed rather than reliability, and the cost of addressing that technical debt post-acquisition can be material.

The user base of a digital asset business requires specific analysis. Trading volume and active user counts are the primary metrics, but buyers need to understand the quality behind those numbers. Wash trading and volume manipulation are not uncommon in the crypto exchange space, and headline volume figures can be significantly inflated. Independent verification of trading volume through on-chain data analysis is a standard part of digital asset due diligence.

Revenue quality is also a specific concern. Businesses that generate revenue primarily from trading fees are exposed to market cycle risk: revenue can decline sharply in bear market conditions when trading volumes fall. Buyers should model revenue under different market scenarios and assess the business's ability to sustain operations through a prolonged market downturn.

Digital asset acquisitions often require non-standard deal structures to address the specific risks of the asset class. Common structural elements include: extended due diligence periods to allow for regulatory approval processes, escrow arrangements for a portion of the consideration pending regulatory clearance, representations and warranties specifically addressing regulatory compliance and asset custody, and earnout structures tied to post-close regulatory outcomes.

The use of cryptocurrency as deal consideration is also possible in some transactions, but introduces additional complexity around valuation, tax treatment, and the mechanics of settlement. Buyers and sellers considering crypto consideration need specialist legal and tax advice specific to their jurisdictions.

For buyers

• Conventional due diligence frameworks are insufficient. Regulatory, custody, technical and token-economics workstreams each require specialist expertise beyond standard M&A practice.
• Revenue quality must be stress-tested across market cycles, as fee-dependent businesses can see sharp declines in bear conditions when trading volumes fall.
• Deal timelines should account for regulatory change-of-control approval processes, with escrow and earnout structures used to manage residual regulatory risk post-signing.

For sellers

• A clean, single-jurisdiction regulatory structure will materially reduce buyer legal costs and transaction risk, making the business more attractive and easier to close.
• Documented custody procedures, audit histories and smart contract reviews reduce friction in due diligence and support stronger representations and warranties.
• Technical debt accumulated during rapid growth periods will be identified and priced into any offer, so addressing infrastructure gaps before a process begins is advisable.

Acquiry runs buy-side and sell-side mandates for digital businesses. We are not limited to the sectors or markets covered here: any sector, any market, bring it to us anyway. Start a mandate (opens in a new tab).